Panoptykon· 1 September 2023· Cross-platform

Fixing Recommender Systems: From Identification of Risk Factors to Meaningful Transparency and Mitigation

By Katarzyna Szymielewicz, Dorota Głowacka, Alexander Hohlfeld, Bhargav Srinivasa Desikan, Hibaq Farah, Marc Faddoul and Tanya O'Carroll

Sets out six hypotheses on how recommender-system design choices (engagement-driven ranking, addictive features, data-driven personalisation) generate DSA Article 34 'systemic risks,' plus a technical checklist of disclosures VLOPs/VLOSEs should make to regulators, auditors and researchers.

Algorithmic Harm & Recommender SystemsPlatform Compliance & GovernanceArt. 34/35 — Systemic risk

Executive summary

AI-generated

This summary was generated by AI from the original report to make it easier to scan and cite. It is not a substitute for the source. Read the original above.

Published as the first VLOPs/VLOSEs were preparing their inaugural DSA risk assessments in August 2023, this briefing argues that recommender systems deserve special regulatory scrutiny because their design choices are a direct driver of the 'systemic risks' Article 34 of the DSA requires platforms to identify and mitigate.

The brief compiles six mechanisms by which recommender-system design can produce such risks: amplifying borderline content because it drives engagement, rewarding provocative engagement with greater reach, making opaque editorial choices that boost or suppress users, exploiting behavioural data to personalise content in ways that harm wellbeing, building in addictive features, and using personal data in ways that enable discrimination. For each, it cites available independent research while acknowledging that outside researchers remain constrained by platforms' unwillingness to share the data needed to verify causal claims.

It closes with a concrete technical checklist, covering the recommender system's algorithmic architecture, input features, training data and interpretability tooling, that it argues the European Commission, independent auditors and researchers should be able to demand from platforms in order to verify risk-assessment claims rather than take them on faith.

Think this summary is wrong? Contact us.