Global Witness· 12 December 2024· X/Twitter

Climate of confusion: Bot-like accounts sharing climate disinformation

By Ellen Judson

22 of 45 previously identified bot-like X accounts amplified climate denial/conspiracies, tying climate opposition to broader anti-migrant, anti-LGBTQ and anti-Ukraine political identity.

Misinformation & DisinformationHate Speech & Extremism

From the source

About this research

This online publication draws on an OSINT investigation, with research spanning 2 countries.

Publication
Archived online publication
Research approach
OSINT investigation
Geographic focus
Ukraine · United Kingdom

Publication details prepared by Social Media Transparency from the original source.

Executive summary

AI-generated

This summary was generated by AI from the original report to make it easier to scan and cite. It is not a substitute for the source. Read the original above.

Building on an earlier Global Witness investigation into 45 bot-like accounts on X that had amplified divisive political content since the UK general election was called, this report examined how a subset of those accounts engaged with climate topics. Accounts were flagged as bot-like using a methodology built on indicators such as prolific posting, low original-content volume, and signs of rapid account creation timed to political events, supplemented by manual checks for authentic human activity.

Of the accounts studied, 22 of the 45 previously identified bot-like accounts shared climate disinformation or conspiracy content, with 14 — all supportive of Reform UK — using the hashtag #ClimateScam, frequently paired with other conspiracy tags such as #geoengineering or #billgates and policy-focused tags like #netzerostupidity. Documented claims included assertions that a "major new study" had disproven CO2's role in global warming.

Global Witness concluded that climate denial content was being used within these networks as part of a broader political identity that also encompassed anti-migrant, anti-LGBTQ, and anti-Ukraine messaging, tying climate disinformation to wider currents of far-right online mobilization rather than treating it as an isolated topic.

Think this summary is wrong? Contact us.