Analysis of the Fraud Ecosystem of Online Advertising on Meta Platforms
By Valentine Auer, Lena Müller-Naendrup and Natalie Trell
The ÖIAT analyzed Meta's Ad Library over three months and found 634,000+ fraudulent or problematic ads shown more than 1 billion times across the EU (123M in Austria). Illegal gambling (~450,000 ads), investment fraud (83,216) and dubious food supplements (27,171) dominated the sample.
About this research
This original report draws on a survey and an ad-library audit, with research spanning one country.
- Publication
- Original report · 81 pages
- Research approach
- survey and ad-library audit
- Geographic focus
- Austria
- Reported study scale
- 450,000 ads · 83,216 ads · 27,171 ads
- Research materials
- Public-source data is described in the publication
Publication details prepared by Social Media Transparency from the original source.
Executive summary
AI-generatedThis summary was generated by AI from the original report to make it easier to scan and cite. It is not a substitute for the source. Read the original above.
The research department of the Austrian Institute for Applied Telecommunications (ÖIAT), which runs the consumer-watchdog service Watchlist Internet, analyzed Meta's public Ad Library over a three-month period on behalf of the Austrian media regulator KommAustria. The study, "Analysis of the Fraud Ecosystem of Online Advertising on Meta Platforms" (presented 1 June 2026), screened advertisements served to users in Austria on Facebook and Instagram for fraudulent and otherwise problematic content, with the study design drawing on Watchlist Internet's fraud-reporting data.
The analysis identified more than 634,000 fraudulent or problematic ads, which were shown over 1 billion times across the EU and roughly 123 million times in Austria. Three fraud categories dominated: illegal online gambling (about 450,000 ads), investment fraud (83,216 ads) and dubious dietary supplements (27,171 ads), alongside fake shops. Deceptive design was a recurring pattern, with artificial scarcity ("Only xxx items left!") and staged urgency ("Offer valid for xxx hours only") used to pressure users. At the time of the survey, 62.4% of the ads flagged by the study had already been removed by Meta for violating its own policies.
Critically, many ads catalogued by the researchers disappeared from the Ad Library shortly afterwards, frustrating independent scrutiny and, the authors argue, breaching the transparency-repository obligations of the Digital Services Act. The report frames Meta's automated ad system as a structural enabler of consumer fraud at scale and calls for a reliable, complete and durable public ad archive.
Think this summary is wrong? Contact us.