Middle East
Jordan
Regulation is content-control: the 2023 Cybercrime Law forces 100k+ platforms to open a local office and enables ad bans and bandwidth throttling for non-compliance, with no DSA-style transparency or accountability obligations.
Scored against the DSA
Each obligation the DSA imposes on very large platforms, and whether Jordanโs law requires the same. Cells cover DSA-style, user-protective transparency and accountability only.
- Required by law
- Partial / emerging
- No such obligation
- Undetermined
Transparency
Transparency reportsDSA Art. 15 / 24 / 42
No content-moderation transparency-report mandate.
Source โReach disclosureDSA Art. 24(2)
The 100k-subscriber threshold triggers a local-office duty, not public reach disclosure.
Source โ
Accountability
Algorithmic transparencyDSA Art. 27 / 38
No recommender-transparency or non-profiling-feed mandate.
Source โRegulator + penaltiesDSA Art. 49โ52, 74
TRC ad-ban/throttling sanctions and PDPL fines target content-removal / local-office and data-protection compliance, not user-protective governance.
Source โ
Child protection
Child-safety duty of careDSA Art. 28
PDPL requires parental consent for children's data; no platform child-safety duty of care.
Source โ
Compare every jurisdiction
Jordan is one of 30 non-EU jurisdictions we scored against the DSA. See them all side by side.