โ† All jurisdictions

Asia

Japan

27%DSA alignment

Japan's only in-force social-media governance law (the MIC-enforced Information Distribution Platform Act, effective April 2025) mandates content-moderation transparency but nothing on ad libraries, researcher access, risk assessment, audits or recommender transparency.

In forceInformation Distribution Platform Act (2024)ยท MIC
In forceAct on Transparency and Fairness of Digital Platforms (TFDPA) (2020)ยท METI

Scored against the DSA

Each obligation the DSA imposes on very large platforms, and whether Japanโ€™s law requires the same. Cells cover DSA-style, user-protective transparency and accountability only.

  • Required by law
  • Partial / emerging
  • No such obligation
  • Undetermined

Transparency

  • No such obligation

    Public ad libraryDSA Art. 39

    No ad-library mandate; the TFDPA covers B2B marketplace/app-store ranking disclosure, not a public ad archive.

  • Required

    Transparency reportsDSA Art. 15 / 24 / 42

    IDPA requires designated large operators (9 designated in 2025) to publicly disclose removal-request and action status annually.

    Source โ†—
  • No such obligation

    Researcher data accessDSA Art. 40

    No vetted-researcher data-access mandate.

  • No such obligation

    Reach disclosureDSA Art. 24(2)

    The user-count figure is only a designation threshold reported to MIC, not a public reach-disclosure duty.

Accountability

  • No such obligation

    Systemic risk assessmentDSA Art. 34โ€“35

    No systemic or child-safety risk-assessment duty; only proposed in a June 2026 MIC youth-protection draft.

  • No such obligation

    Independent auditDSA Art. 37

    No external compliance-audit mandate.

  • No such obligation

    Algorithmic transparencyDSA Art. 27 / 38

    No user-facing recommender-transparency or chronological-feed mandate.

  • Required

    Regulator + penaltiesDSA Art. 49โ€“52, 74

    MIC enforces IDPA orders; corporate violations of key articles up to about 100M yen (modest by DSA standards).

    Source โ†—

Child protection

  • No such obligation

    No profiling ads to minorsDSA Art. 26(3) / 28

    No ban on targeted advertising to minors.

  • Age assuranceBeyond the DSA

    Narrow in-force duty: dating-site age/ID verification to exclude minors; general social-media age checks only proposed (June 2026).

    Source โ†—
  • Child-safety duty of careDSA Art. 28

    The Youth Internet Environment Act imposes filtering duties on carriers and best-efforts duties on operators; no DSA-style child risk assessment.

    Source โ†—

On the horizon

What's being debated

Information Distribution Platform Act (IDPA)

Designated large platforms must publish and apply content-removal standards, disclose moderation practices and meet response deadlines, overseen by the MIC, which has signed a DSA-enforcement cooperation arrangement with the EU.

Latest: Took effect 1 April 2025; MIC designated Google, LINE Yahoo, Meta, TikTok and X as large platforms on 30 April 2025. source โ†—

Compare every jurisdiction

Japan is one of 30 non-EU jurisdictions we scored against the DSA. See them all side by side.