โ† All jurisdictions

Latin America

Brazil

36%DSA alignment

Brazil has Latin America's most developed platform-governance regime, driven by the June 2025 STF intermediary-liability ruling and the in-force ECA Digital children's law, but still lacks a DSA-style systemic-risk, ad-library and researcher-access framework.

In forceECA Digital (Lei 15.211) (2025)ยท ANPD
In forceSTF ruling on Marco Civil Art. 19 (2025)ยท Judiciary
In forceMarco Civil da Internet (Lei 12.965) (2014)

Scored against the DSA

Each obligation the DSA imposes on very large platforms, and whether Brazilโ€™s law requires the same. Cells cover DSA-style, user-protective transparency and accountability only.

  • Required by law
  • Partial / emerging
  • No such obligation
  • Undetermined

Transparency

  • No such obligation

    Public ad libraryDSA Art. 39

    No all-ads library mandate; the STF ruling requires reporting on ads and boosting, not a searchable public repository.

    Source โ†—
  • Transparency reportsDSA Art. 15 / 24 / 42

    The STF's June 2025 Art. 19 ruling requires platforms to self-regulate and publish annual transparency reports on notices, ads and boosted content.

    Source โ†—
  • No such obligation

    Researcher data accessDSA Art. 40

    No vetted-researcher data-access mandate in force.

  • No such obligation

    Reach disclosureDSA Art. 24(2)

    No periodic active-user / reach disclosure mandate.

Accountability

  • No such obligation

    Systemic risk assessmentDSA Art. 34โ€“35

    No systemic-risk-assessment mandate; only child-protection duties under ECA Digital.

  • No such obligation

    Independent auditDSA Art. 37

    No independent / external compliance-audit mandate.

  • Algorithmic transparencyDSA Art. 27 / 38

    ECA Digital requires configurable recommendation controls for minors' accounts; no general chronological-feed or recommender-transparency mandate.

    Source โ†—
  • Regulator + penaltiesDSA Art. 49โ€“52, 74

    ANPD enforces the LGPD and ECA Digital (fines up to 10% of group revenue, capped R$50M), but there is no dedicated general platform-governance regulator.

    Source โ†—

Child protection

  • No profiling ads to minorsDSA Art. 26(3) / 28

    ECA Digital restricts profiling-based advertising directed at children and adolescents.

    Source โ†—
  • Required

    Age assuranceBeyond the DSA

    ECA Digital (in force 17 March 2026) bans age self-declaration and mandates reliable age verification for restricted services including social media.

    Source โ†—
  • Required

    Child-safety duty of careDSA Art. 28

    ECA Digital imposes child-safety duties (moderation, parental controls, data protection) on platforms accessible to minors.

    Source โ†—

On the horizon

What's being debated

PL 2630 'Fake News Bill' + STF platform-liability ruling

Algorithmic transparency, annual transparency reports, moderation due-process and independent oversight in PL 2630, echoed by the Supreme Court's DSA-inspired procedural duties on platforms.

Latest: PL 2630 stalled in Congress since 2023; on 26 June 2025 the STF struck down part of Marco Civil Art. 19 and imposed DSA-style transparency/self-regulation duties. source โ†—

Compare every jurisdiction

Brazil is one of 30 non-EU jurisdictions we scored against the DSA. See them all side by side.