← All jurisdictions

Latin America

Argentina

5%DSA alignment

Argentina has no DSA-style platform-transparency or accountability law in force, relying on the 2000 data-protection statute and consumer law, while a 2025-2026 wave of child-safety and algorithm bills remains unpassed.

In forceLey 25.326 de Protección de los Datos Personales (2000)· AAIP
ProposedProyectos de niñez digital y algoritmos adictivos (López, Brügge) (2026)· AAIP (propuesto)

Scored against the DSA

Each obligation the DSA imposes on very large platforms, and whether Argentina’s law requires the same. Cells cover DSA-style, user-protective transparency and accountability only.

  • Required by law
  • Partial / emerging
  • No such obligation
  • Undetermined

Transparency

  • No such obligation

    Public ad libraryDSA Art. 39

    No DSA Art. 39-type ad-repository obligation; regime is general data-protection plus consumer law.

    Source ↗
  • No such obligation

    Transparency reportsDSA Art. 15 / 24 / 42

    No content-moderation transparency-report obligation; no bill proposes one.

    Source ↗
  • No such obligation

    Researcher data accessDSA Art. 40

    No vetted-researcher data-access mandate (no DSA Art. 40 analogue).

    Source ↗
  • No such obligation

    Reach disclosureDSA Art. 24(2)

    No active-user / reach disclosure mandate.

    Source ↗

Accountability

  • No such obligation

    Systemic risk assessmentDSA Art. 34–35

    No in-force risk-assessment duty; proposed in the Brügge bill (impact evaluations for products aimed at minors).

    Source ↗
  • No such obligation

    Independent auditDSA Art. 37

    No independent external-audit mandate (no DSA Art. 37 analogue).

    Source ↗
  • No such obligation

    Algorithmic transparencyDSA Art. 27 / 38

    No in-force recommender-transparency duty; the Brügge bill would ban addictive recommenders for minors, but it is only proposed.

    Source ↗
  • Regulator + penaltiesDSA Art. 49–52, 74

    The AAIP is a real data-protection regulator with fining power, but only for data-protection breaches (Ley 25.326), not platform-governance; statutory fines are trivially small in real terms.

    Source ↗

Child protection

  • No such obligation

    No profiling ads to minorsDSA Art. 26(3) / 28

    No in-force ban on profiling ads to minors; proposed in the Brügge and data-protection reform bills.

    Source ↗
  • No such obligation

    Age assuranceBeyond the DSA

    No in-force age-verification mandate; proposed in bill 1114-D-2026 (accounts barred under 13).

    Source ↗
  • No such obligation

    Child-safety duty of careDSA Art. 28

    No in-force platform child-safety duty; grooming is a criminal offence against offenders, not a platform duty. Only proposed (Brügge, 1114-D-2026).

    Source ↗

On the horizon

What's being debated

Bill on addictive algorithms / protection of minors (Brügge)

Bans addictive design aimed at minors and requires data-protection impact assessments, a local legal representative for foreign firms and audits/sanctions by the data-protection authority, but is centred on child protection.

Latest: Presented in June 2026, part of a wave of Argentine bills targeting addictive platform design and minors. source ↗

Compare every jurisdiction

Argentina is one of 30 non-EU jurisdictions we scored against the DSA. See them all side by side.