Banned But Not Gone: YouTube profits from Andrew Tate's misogyny
YouTube still hosts and monetizes Andrew Tate's misogynistic content despite banning his account.
About this research
This original report draws on content analysis, a platform experiment and API/data analysis, with research spanning 4 countries.
- Publication
- Original report · 17 pages
- Research approach
- content analysis, platform experiment and API/data analysis
- Geographic focus
- Germany · Ireland · United Kingdom · United States
- Reported study scale
- 100 videos
- Research materials
- Public-source data is described in the publication
Publication details prepared by Social Media Transparency from the original source.
Executive summary
AI-generatedThis summary was generated by AI from the original report to make it easier to scan and cite. It is not a substitute for the source. Read the original above.
CCDH analyzed the 100 most-viewed YouTube videos featuring Andrew Tate's misogynistic content posted over the preceding year, despite YouTube having banned Tate's own channel, examining video accessibility to minors, policy compliance, and advertising presence.
The 100 videos had accumulated 54 million views combined. All were accessible to test accounts simulating 13-year-old boys in the UK and US, and 98 were accessible in Ireland and Germany. Sixty-five of the videos originated from fan accounts rather than Tate's own, and researchers judged 58 to violate YouTube's hate speech policies; of those policy-violating videos, 31 carried brand advertising, indicating monetization of rule-breaking content.
The report concludes that YouTube's ban on Tate's account has done little to curb the distribution of his content through re-uploads and podcast clips, and that the platform's continued ad placement on and youth accessibility to this material represents an unresolved child-safety and enforcement gap.
Think this summary is wrong? Contact us.